Fujifilm FinePix X100 Review
Review based on a production X100 with Firmware 1.01
In amongst all the cameras announced at Photokina 2010 – including enthusiast SLRs such as the Nikon D7000, Canon EOS 60D, Pentax K-5 and Sigma SD1 – one utterly unexpected model stole the show. Fujifilm unveiled the FinePix X100, a compact camera with an SLR-size APS-C sensor and traditional analogue control dials, that hides ground-breaking technology inside a retro-styled body with looks to die for. It’s the company’s first camera with a large, APS-C sensor aimed at professionals and advanced amateurs since the S5 Pro DSLR of 2006.
Fujifilm may be a company that’s currently best-known for its prolific production of compact cameras, but in reality it has a long tradition of making somewhat left-field, unique cameras aimed at serious enthusiasts and professionals. The company regularly sought out market niches in the days of film, from its Fujica 6×9 format rangefinders, through the GA645Zi medium format ‘zoom compact’, to the TX-1 35mm panoramic rangefinder (better known in Western markets as the Hasselblad XPan), all of which still command premium prices on the used market today. In the digital era it has concentrated mainly on its innovative SuperCCD sensor technology, employing it to provide class-leading dynamic range on cameras such as the S5 Pro and the EXR series of zoom compacts. Along the way it has made some genuine cult classics, including the F30 and F31Fd compacts which earned a reputation as excellent low-light performers.
The large-sensor, fixed-lens compact isn’t a new idea, of course, and both Sigma’s DP series and the Leica X1 have already visited this territory. However these haven’t been entirely convincing products, plagued by slow operation, low-resolution LCDs and, in the case of the Sigmas, a somewhat quirky interface. For this reason they’ve struggled to establish a compelling raison d’etre, especially in the face of competition from the new breed of interchangeable lens mirrorless compacts typified by the Olympus Pen series and Sony NEXs. So the huge question is whether Fujifilm has managed to refine the concept, and produce a camera that’s as compelling to shoot with as its specifications (and looks) suggest.
Key features 12 megapixel APS-C sized CMOS sensor Fixed 23mm F2 lens (field of view equivalent to a 35mm lens on full frame) 2.8″ LCD screen, 4:3 aspect ratio, 460,000 dots Hybrid optical / electronic viewfinder OVF with 0.5x magnification, projected framelines indicate approx 90% of field of view EVF with ca 0.5x magnification, 1,440,000 dots Traditional-style control dials for shutter speed, aperture and exposure compensation ISO 100 (L), 200-6400, 12800 (H) Flash hot shoe and built-in flash Built-in neutral density filter (3 stops) 1280×720 HD motion picture recording with stereo sound Compared to…

Specifications compared
The table below lists some of the key specifications of the X100 and its competitors. What’s notable is the combination of an unusually fast lens and a massive APS-C sensor, which together bode well for its low-light capability.
Camera Lens* LCD Dimensions & Weight(with lens, battery + card) Sensor (effective pixels) Fujifilm FinePix X100 35mm equiv, F2 2.7″ 460k pixels 126 x 74 x 54 mm, 445g 5.0 x 3.0 x 2.2 in, 15.8 oz 12.3 Mp CMOS (ca. 23.6 x 15.8 mm) Leica X1 35mm equiv, F2.8 2.7″ 230k pixels 124 x 60 x 50 mm, 330g 4.9 x 2.4 x 2.0 in, 10.9 oz 12.2 Mp CMOS (23.6 x 15.8 mm) Panasonic DMC-GF1 40mm equiv, F1.7* 3.0″ 460k pixels 119 x 71 x 61 mm, 448g 4.6 x 2.8 x 2.4 in, 15.8 oz 12.1 MP LiveMOS (17.3 x 13 mm) Sony NEX-5 24mm equiv, F2.8* 3.0″, tilting 920k pixels 111 x 59 x 54 mm, 361g 4.4 x 2.3 x 2.1 in, 12.7 oz 14.2 Mp HD CMOS (23.4 x 15.6mm) Sigma DP2 40mm equiv, F2.8 2.5″ 230k pixels 115 x 64 x 56mm, 280g 4.5 x 2.5 x 2.2 in, 9.9 oz 4.6 MP x 3 X3F (20.7 x 13.8 mm)
*The Panasonic DMC-GF1 and Sony NEX-5 both accept interchangeable lenses
If you are new to digital photography you may wish to read the DigitalPhotography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you comprehend some of the terms used).
Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.
Images which can be viewed at a bigger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a bigger (typically VGA) image in a new window.
To navigate the review simply use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section either pick the section from the drop down or choose it from the navigation bar at the top.
DPReview calibrate their monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted) PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally A,B and C.
This article is Copyright 2011 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.
source : www.dpreview.com
Other Post:
- iPhone 4 vs. HTC EVO 4G Video Causes Best Buy To Suspend Employee
- Has your company been infiltrated by the Shady Rat hack?
- Less than 300 US dollars for the Sony Ericsson X8 in the US
- Fujitsu LifeBook T580 Now Available For Pre-order
- Why do we trust Google?
- British British Open Championship 2010 iPhone App with Live Streaming
- Sony Ericsson XPERIA Arc preview: First look
- Scarab Labs released Star Filter for Mac
- Memo to Microsoft: do not bet against Amazon
- Riverbed CEO Jerry Kennelly speaks WAN optimization
Details :
Submited at Tuesday, May 17th, 2011 at 2:00 pm on Digital Camera by dave
Comment RSS 2.0 - leave a comment - trackback
